Re: RAPID PVST question (forward-delay)

Yes - and it is a global configuration change for both (or all)
switches involved.

Warmest Regards,

Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626
http://www.INE.com

Test your Core Knowledge today!
Q: What type of IGMP message is not supported by IGMPv1 but is
supported by IGMPv2?
A: Leave Message
More Info: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc957916.aspx

On Jul 26, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Joe Astorino wrote:

> You would change forward delay to 6 seconds in both cases.
>
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Rameez Khan
> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> To: CCIE Groupstudy
> ReplyTo: Rameez Khan
> Subject: RAPID PVST question (forward-delay)
> Sent: Jul 26, 2009 6:18 AM
>
> i have to ask 1 thng, in RAPID-PVST ,if we want to change total
> startup-delay incase when switch one port fails to let say 12 seconds
> so i wld do
> spanning-tree vlan_A forward-delay 16
> and incase of PVST+ , i do
> spanning-tree vlan_A forward-delay 8
>
> am i right or am i mising sme thng ????
> and it needs to configred on both ends or it is local to the switch ?
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Cell: +1.586.212.6107
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jul 26 2009 - 13:18:54 ART