Guys,
I was working on a scenario today and got some results I wasn't expecting. I
didn't save my exact configs, but I put together the basics of how it was
setup below. If there are any typos, sorry, I did it in notepad.
R1
router ospf 1
network 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
redis connected route-map redis-connected metric 10 metric-type 1 subnets
!
interface fa0/0
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface fa0/1
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
!
route-map redis-connected permit 10
match interface fa0/1
R2
router ospf 1
network 10.10.10.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
distance 180 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 external-routes
!
int fa0/0
ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
!
ip access-list standard external-routes
permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
The scenario was that I wanted any routes learned by R2 from R1 that were
"external" to have an AD of 180. The two routers are connected via their
Fa0/0 interfaces. R1's Fa0/1 has the subnet that will be brought into OSPF
as an external... and I was attempting to match this route via the
access-list attached to the distance command under the OSPF process on R2.
After I set this up, I looked at R2's routing table and R2 had learned it
via OSPF with an AD of 110. If I changed the 192.168.0.0/24 subnet to be
apart of Area 0, rather than an external it changed the AD to 180.
Also, when I used "distance ospf external 180" this worked fine. However, it
messed up some other requirements in the scenario, so I couldn't use it.
Is this behavior normal? Does the "distance" command not work with
externals? Or is it that I was probably just doing something wrong
elsewhere?
Chris
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun May 17 2009 - 18:56:25 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:43 ART