i think on R1 RouterID is 192.168.0.1(higher IP). so on R2 distance
command should look like this:
distance 180 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 external-routes
(if you want, you can use wildcards)
also, you can change RouterID manualy on R1 to fa0/0 ip (router-id
10.10.10.1), and use this command on R2
distance 180 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 external-routes
-- wbr, sergey khalavchuk On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Chris Breece <cbreece1_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Guys, > > I was working on a scenario today and got some results I wasn't expecting. I > didn't save my exact configs, but I put together the basics of how it was > setup below. If there are any typos, sorry, I did it in notepad. > > > R1 > router ospf 1 > network 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 > redis connected route-map redis-connected metric 10 metric-type 1 subnets > ! > interface fa0/0 > ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface fa0/1 > ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > route-map redis-connected permit 10 > match interface fa0/1 > > > R2 > router ospf 1 > network 10.10.10.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 > distance 180 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 external-routes > ! > int fa0/0 > ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 > ! > ip access-list standard external-routes > permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 > > > The scenario was that I wanted any routes learned by R2 from R1 that were > "external" to have an AD of 180. The two routers are connected via their > Fa0/0 interfaces. R1's Fa0/1 has the subnet that will be brought into OSPF > as an external... and I was attempting to match this route via the > access-list attached to the distance command under the OSPF process on R2. > > After I set this up, I looked at R2's routing table and R2 had learned it > via OSPF with an AD of 110. If I changed the 192.168.0.0/24 subnet to be > apart of Area 0, rather than an external it changed the AD to 180. > > Also, when I used "distance ospf external 180" this worked fine. However, it > messed up some other requirements in the scenario, so I couldn't use it. > > > Is this behavior normal? Does the "distance" command not work with > externals? Or is it that I was probably just doing something wrong > elsewhere? > > Chris Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon May 18 2009 - 10:14:02 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:43 ART