Re: QoS for PPPoE / ADSL

Hey team,

I think the only question left is how to keep the LLQ from taking too much
of the bw correct? We know how to do this ... , but the question remaining
is where to set your interface bandwidth?

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Joseph L. Brunner
<joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>wrote:

> Guess you live in a place where the copper wasn't carrying phone calls
> during the first Roosevelt Administration ;), and you don't have Verizon
>
> LOL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale Shaw [mailto:dale.shaw_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 4:29 AM
> To: Joseph L. Brunner
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: QoS for PPPoE / ADSL
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Joseph L. Brunner
> <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
> > You're better off going with conservative numbers and "ripping your self
> off"
> > Your not really going to get layer 1 sync up speeds at layer 3 mate...
> > They can only make money handing your traffic off to over subscribed
> peering points...
> > Next time, you want unicast me, I'll run an iperf with you on a 1Gbps
> att link that is not really used...
> > You'll probably be surprised how your dsl traffic flies
>
> Thanks for the assumption-based comments, Joe ;-)
>
> Actually, accounting for ATM cell tax and PPPoE overhead, I get
> goodput aligned pretty closely with the up/down sync speeds as
> reported by my modem.
>
> Maybe you should change ISPs and/or move closer to your DSLAM.
>
> cheers,
> Dale
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net