Check my CCNP ONT Lab 1 solution guide - page 18,
"2.4 Deploying QOS on virtual interfaces"
http://www.affirmedsystems.com/workbooks/CCNP-ONT-Lab-1-Solutions.pdf
I've included the "show commands" from my router with PPPoE
-Joe
________________________________
From: ALL From_NJ [mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 10:57 AM
To: Joseph L. Brunner
Cc: Dale Shaw; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: QoS for PPPoE / ADSL
Hey team,
I think the only question left is how to keep the LLQ from taking too much of
the bw correct? We know how to do this ... , but the question remaining is
where to set your interface bandwidth?
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Joseph L. Brunner
<joe_at_affirmedsystems.com<mailto:joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>> wrote:
Guess you live in a place where the copper wasn't carrying phone calls during
the first Roosevelt Administration ;), and you don't have Verizon
LOL
-----Original Message-----
From: Dale Shaw [mailto:dale.shaw_at_gmail.com<mailto:dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>]
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 4:29 AM
To: Joseph L. Brunner
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: QoS for PPPoE / ADSL
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Joseph L. Brunner
<joe_at_affirmedsystems.com<mailto:joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>> wrote:
> You're better off going with conservative numbers and "ripping your self
off"
> Your not really going to get layer 1 sync up speeds at layer 3 mate...
> They can only make money handing your traffic off to over subscribed peering
points...
> Next time, you want unicast me, I'll run an iperf with you on a 1Gbps att
link that is not really used...
> You'll probably be surprised how your dsl traffic flies
Thanks for the assumption-based comments, Joe ;-)
Actually, accounting for ATM cell tax and PPPoE overhead, I get
goodput aligned pretty closely with the up/down sync speeds as
reported by my modem.
Maybe you should change ISPs and/or move closer to your DSLAM.
cheers,
Dale
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 11 2009 - 11:05:59 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:42 ART