Re: BGP

Marish,

Have you used any debugging?
What parameters need to match for a BGP peer to come up?
What options do we have to choose the local ip address for a BGP peering
relationship?

Bryan Bartik
CCIE #23707, CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:56 AM, marish shah <contactmarish_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Expert,
> Im doing BGP lab I create BGP neigh relationship between R1 and
> SW1 but its not coming I also run eigrp because it is not
> directly neigh so from eigrp I'm getting route of SW1 and I'm also able to
> ping but in bgp sh ip bgp summ command R1 status with Sw1 is active .means
> there is no bgp neigh relation.
> Actually from R1 there is two path to reach Sw1
>
> SW1 - R6- R1-connected with R3 and R3 - Sw1 mean there is ring topology
>
> R1 getting routes from Sw1 via R3 and I create and my bgp neigh from R1
> -
> R6 - sw1
>
> So my Q is that is bgp neigh relation is also depend on IGP
> path selection.Because when I create static to words Sw1 by using same path
> where I configure my BGP neigh relation its work R1 - R6 - Sw1 its work
> fine.
> But removing static neigh state becomes again active because eigrp getting
> sw1 routes via R3 .. R1 - R3 -Sw1
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net