Re: BGP

HI Marish,

Have you configured the update-source command in your BGP config. My
guess is that when you are configuring the static towards SW1 , the
source address of the BGP packet will be of the interface that you
have configured as the peering address of R1. While when R1 is
dynamically learning the information through EIGRP the source address
is different than what the BGP process is expecting it to. Also, what
addresses are you using for the peering. Physical addresses or
loopbacks ??

Ravi

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:56 PM, marish shah <contactmarish_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Expert,
> Im doing BGP lab I create BGP neigh relationship between R1 and
> SW1 but its not coming I also run eigrp because it is not
> directly neigh so from eigrp I'm getting route of SW1 and I'm also able to
> ping but in bgp sh ip bgp summ command R1 status with Sw1 is active .means
> there is no bgp neigh relation.
> Actually from R1 there is two path to reach Sw1
>
> SW1 - R6- R1-connected with R3 and R3 - Sw1 mean there is ring topology
>
> R1 getting routes from Sw1 via R3 and I create and my bgp neigh from R1 -
> R6 - sw1
>
> So my Q is that is bgp neigh relation is also depend on IGP
> path selection.Because when I create static to words Sw1 by using same path
> where I configure my BGP neigh relation its work R1 - R6 - Sw1 its work
> fine.
> But removing static neigh state becomes again active because eigrp getting
> sw1 routes via R3 .. R1 - R3 -Sw1
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed May 06 2009 - 15:17:48 ART