Re: New Blueprint - Can Anyone Think of a Need for the "E"

Hello Team,
I have deployed several of these switches. Not only do you have the 10 gig
uplinks. You also meet the power requirement of the 1252N AP from Cisco,
without using power injectors. I did a lot of research on these switches and
this would be the best switch to work with the wireless 1252 AP. I would
think that Cisco along with other companies is trying to standardize on
their equipment.
Sincerely,
John

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Travis Niedens <niedentj_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

> I've mentioned a few times on here that the CCIE R/S lab environment does
> not necessarily reflect the hardware profile that many companies have
> deployed; much of the 65xx chassis / line cards come with their own caveats
> and new features as you mention (VSS, MEC, etc.). Additionally, Cisco is
> pushing for a migration to Nexus switches for the Data Center and that runs
> a completely different codebase. Even though this all is discussed in jest,
> I seriously wonder how long it will be before a CCIE level test is created
> using 65xx / Nexus platforms. Perhaps with the Data Center 3.0 idea they
> also should consider a CCIE DC Track (heck, there's more $$$ in that than
> wireless).
>
> Travis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Brad
> Ellis
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:28 PM
> To: Scott Morris; Tyson Scott
> Cc: Scott M Vermillion; Cisco certification
> Subject: RE: New Blueprint - Can Anyone Think of a Need for the "E"
> Series
> 3560?
>
> I think if it was a sales thing, they'd add some Cat6500-VSS 1440s or
> Nexus7000s to the lab exam. (No, don't even say CSR-1!) Oh man, I hope
> I didn't give "them" any ideas! That would be a pretty smart move by
> Cisco. I could see the year-end earnings go through the roof. Stock
> price would follow! :)
>
> thanks,
> Brad Ellis
> CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
> CCSI# 30482
> CEO / President
> CCBOOTCAMP - A Cisco Learning Partner (CLP)
> Email: brad_at_ccbootcamp.com
> Toll Free: 877-654-2243
> Direct: +1-702-968-5100 = Outside the USA
> FAX: +1-702-446-8012
> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Scott Morris
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:15 PM
> To: Tyson Scott
> Cc: 'Scott M Vermillion'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: Re: New Blueprint - Can Anyone Think of a Need for the "E"
> Series 3560?
>
> I agree. Unless it's a sales thing. We're coming up on quarter-end,
> aren't we? Or year-end? :)
>
> It'll make some sales reps really happy if we all rush out to buy
> 3560E's. But I hardly think it's necessary!
>
> Even Brian McGahan can't type at gigabit speed! :)
>
>
>
>
> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>
> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>
> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>
> smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com
>
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
>
> Knowledge is power.
>
> Power corrupts.
>
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>
>
>
>
> Tyson Scott wrote:
> > Scott,
> >
> > I am not sure if it is inside information that they will be using the
> 3560 E
> > Series but I find it surprising if that is the case. They are going
> with
> > 1841's which are about as cheap as it gets. I find it unlikely they
> would
> > then use 3560-E's with the 1841's. On Cisco's post it says
> >
> > Catalyst 3560 Series switches running IOS version 12.2 - Advanced IP
> > Services
> >
> > https://cisco.hosted.jivesoftware.com/docs/DOC-4602
> >
> > I assume that they also mean IP Services as Advanced IP Services has
> been
> > phased out and the options are now IP Services and IP Base.
> >
> > I find it more likely they would connect the 3825's to the 3560 with
> SFP
> > GBICs, (Either Fiber or Copper) on the 3560 then waste a 3560-E with
> 24 GB
> > Ethernet ports. But who knows sometimes.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security
> > Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Scott M Vermillion
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:53 AM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: New Blueprint - Can Anyone Think of a Need for the "E" Series
> 3560?
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > So we know they're moving to the ISRs (about time!) on the router side
>
> > of the house. In looking at the blueprint, can anyone see what might
>
> > be driving them to the "E" flavor of the 3560? In the real world,
> > 10GigE is often the driving factor for ponying up the extra $$$, at
> > least in my experience. Not sure what value that would hold here?
> > Just curious more than anything...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed May 06 2009 - 09:46:00 ART