Re: FW: Ip address question.....

While it could be any value, my best guess would be that back then we
were just starting to get into things and had mostly 16-bit processors
and it became an "ease of programming" at the machine code/assembler level.

Even back then, the assumption was we'd move to a 32-bit processor and
eventually to a 64-bit one. So while they could come up with an address
of semi-infinite length, they probably looked at the machine types and
processing capability of the time and worked within semi-efficient scopes.

Just my two cents. (That was even before my time) ;)

*Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,

JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.

JNCI-M, JNCI-ER

smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.

http://www.InternetworkExpert.com

Toll Free: 877-224-8987

Outside US: 775-826-4344

Knowledge is power.

Power corrupts.

Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......

Amit Joshi wrote:
> From: Amit Joshi [mailto:amitkjoshi.cisco_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 8:44 AM
> To: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Ip address question.....
>
>
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> May be it is silly question here. I read the RFC791 to
> understand that why the IP address is 32 bits but there is no more
> information about it.
>
>
>
> May be it is irrelevant question, but I would like to know why the IP
> address is 32 bits only why not 48 bits.
>
>
>
> Look forward to your reply.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Amit Joshi
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun May 03 2009 - 09:10:30 ART