Hi all,
A hypothetical question..
We all know that's good practice to disable F/R inverse-arp and nail
down your L3-L2 mappings, but if there was no task that required the
dynamic mappings to be disabled, and all the necessarily mappings for
the topology were statically mapped and functional, would we lose
points for the 'extra' dynamic mappings?
Note I am not talking about the infamous "0.0.0.0" mappings -- they
can obviously cause operational headaches.
Curious on the group's thoughts on this, but please include a reason
other than just "it's just the way I do it", for disabling F/R InARP,
if that's what you do.
cheers,
Dale
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 21 2009 - 18:19:30 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART