Re: YAFRIAQ (Yet Another Frame Relay Inverse ARP Question)

Agree with Robert, just to make sure !!

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Robert Steeneken <r.steeneken_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> I would disable it always (when the lab allows me ofcource) just to know
> exactly what the mappings are. And I am not surprised by mappings that are
> dynamicly are formed. Just to be sure.
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A hypothetical question..
> >
> > We all know that's good practice to disable F/R inverse-arp and nail
> > down your L3-L2 mappings, but if there was no task that required the
> > dynamic mappings to be disabled, and all the necessarily mappings for
> > the topology were statically mapped and functional, would we lose
> > points for the 'extra' dynamic mappings?
> >
> > Note I am not talking about the infamous "0.0.0.0" mappings -- they
> > can obviously cause operational headaches.
> >
> > Curious on the group's thoughts on this, but please include a reason
> > other than just "it's just the way I do it", for disabling F/R InARP,
> > if that's what you do.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Dale
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 21 2009 - 11:36:53 ART