Re: YAFRIAQ (Yet Another Frame Relay Inverse ARP Question)

I would disable it always (when the lab allows me ofcource) just to know
exactly what the mappings are. And I am not surprised by mappings that are
dynamicly are formed. Just to be sure.

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> A hypothetical question..
>
> We all know that's good practice to disable F/R inverse-arp and nail
> down your L3-L2 mappings, but if there was no task that required the
> dynamic mappings to be disabled, and all the necessarily mappings for
> the topology were statically mapped and functional, would we lose
> points for the 'extra' dynamic mappings?
>
> Note I am not talking about the infamous "0.0.0.0" mappings -- they
> can obviously cause operational headaches.
>
> Curious on the group's thoughts on this, but please include a reason
> other than just "it's just the way I do it", for disabling F/R InARP,
> if that's what you do.
>
> cheers,
> Dale
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 21 2009 - 10:32:15 ART