Hey Jared,
That was a great explaination... I've been wondering this for months and
even ask everyone in my company, no one could honestly explain the detailed
difference.... but know I understand...
Dinesh
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Jared Scrivener <jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
> Sure it can make a difference in the exam, Aly.
>
> For "ip multicast boundary" look for questions about allowing or denying
> certain multicast traffic through an interface. This command is also
> bi-directional, so that would probably be factored into the wording (or
> inferable from the wording).
>
> For "ip igmp access-group" look for questions about hosts on a subnet being
> able to either only join certain groups or not join certain groups, as that
> is what the command is for.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
> Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> aly.groupstudy_at_gmail.com
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2009 7:54 AM
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: ip multicast boundary
>
> A quick question
> What is the difference between using
> RX(config-if)#ip multicast boundary
> RX(config-if)#ip igmp access-group
>
> I know one filters the igmp requests and the other filters the traffic
>
> but practically in the exam does it make a difference
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Apr 18 2009 - 12:15:32 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART