Hi Colm,
thanks for your prompt reply and sorry for the delay in replying. I could
not check my email earlier. Yes i would start with the layer 2 redundancy
and in regards to sup redundancy in the same chassis I have configured mode
as ss0 and the default commands.
I would keep you'll posted as i would be doing the migration today evening.
Have a pleasant weekend, Group study rocks !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Regards
Sam
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Colm O'Leary (co.oleary_at_gmail.com) <
co.oleary_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Mate,
>
> You need to look at what you are trying to achieve:
>
> 1. Device Redundancy
> 2. Supervisor Redundacy
> 3. L3 Redundancy
> 4. L2 Redundancy
>
> I would suggest you start at L2 and work up.
>
> Colm
>
> 2009/4/17 sajid mavani <sajidmavani_at_gmail.com>
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I neede your suggestion.
>>
>> I am doing a migration activity where there is one 4507 switch that would
>> be
>> replace by two 6513 switch ( this is the hub location.)
>>
>> Each of the 6513 switches has two sup engines.
>>
>> I just wanted how could i get redundacny between the 2 sup engines of two
>> switches. I am configuring HSRP on the switches and making SW1 active &
>> switch 2 as Stanby.
>>
>> What would be the physical conectivity between the sup ? and their
>> redundacny configurartion.
>>
>> Please help me out as per your earliest Convinience.
>>
>> Have a Pleasant day.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Apr 18 2009 - 12:06:52 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART