Re: Need guidance for Migrating from 4507 to 6513.

From: Pavel Bykov <slidersv_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:14:54 +0200

As a rule of thumb, usually sups are connected with it's own ports.

port1-supA-chassisA <<-->> port1-supA-chassisB
port2-supA-chassisA <<-->> port2-supA-chassisB

port1-supB-chassisA <<-->> port1-supB-chassisB
port2-supB-chassisA <<-->> port2-supB-chassisB

but if you really want reference design, with all the details, go here:

www.cisco.com/go/cvd

This is one of the biggest Cisco's advantages = Documentation. Lots and Lots
and Lots of highest grade documentation. In fact, it was voted best
documented something, ever.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:06 AM, sajid mavani <sajidmavani_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I neede your suggestion.
>
> I am doing a migration activity where there is one 4507 switch that would
> be
> replace by two 6513 switch ( this is the hub location.)
>
> Each of the 6513 switches has two sup engines.
>
> I just wanted how could i get redundacny between the 2 sup engines of two
> switches. I am configuring HSRP on the switches and making SW1 active &
> switch 2 as Stanby.
>
> What would be the physical conectivity between the sup ? and their
> redundacny configurartion.
>
> Please help me out as per your earliest Convinience.
>
> Have a Pleasant day.
>
> Regards
>
> Sam
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Pavel Bykov
----------------
Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of
your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Apr 17 2009 - 22:14:54 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART