RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility

Hi Keisikka,

Will the modem act as the converter here or do we need a separate convereter?

Regards,

Ranjith Samuel

> From: keisikka_at_hotmail.com
> To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; jerry.du_at_accenture.com;
ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:09:10 +0800
>
> Set V35 converter to Unframed.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Ranjith Samuel" <ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:34 PM
> To: <jerry.du_at_accenture.com>; <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>
> > Service provider has provided a modem on one side where I have the V35
> > Interface. The other side there is no modem, just an RJ 45 going into my
> > E1
> > Card.
> >
> >
> >
> > Since there are two service providers the blame is being thrown around
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:31:45 +0800
> > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
> > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Id like to advise have service provider provide this modem or it would be
> > an
> > argue point of circuit down.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jerry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Ranjith Samuel [mailto:ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:28 PM
> > To: Du, Jerry; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> >
> > Dear Jerry,
> >
> > Can the modem from the service provider take care of this conversion or do
> > we
> > need to buy a specific convereter?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ranjith Samuel
> >
> >> From: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com
> >> To: jerry.du_at_accenture.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >> Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> >> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:31:54 +0530
> >>
> >> Great. Thanx Jerry!! You're a life saver!!
> >>
> >> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> >> > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:48:12 +0800
> >> > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
> >> > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >> >
> >> > You should have a convert at V.35 end or G.703 BNC will not able to
> >> > connect to. The connection would like follow:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > A router - E1 interface - G.703 - (Service provider) - G.703 BNC -
> >> > G.703
> >> > to V.35 converter - V.35 interface - B router
> >> >
> >> > |----------------- A end------------|
> >> > |----------------------------------B
> >> > end---------------------------------|
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Jerry
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________
> >> >
> >> > From: Ranjith Samuel [mailto:ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:31 PM
> >> > To: Du, Jerry; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for your reply Jerry.
> >> >
> >> > So do we need a G.703 <-> V.35 conveter at either end for this circuit
> >> > to work?? Wont G.703 interface talk to V.35 interface without the
> >> > convereter?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Ranjith Samuel
> >> >
> >> > > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> >> > > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:10:41 +0800
> >> > > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
> >> > > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi Ranjith,
> >> > >
> >> > > Yes, G.703 interface is able to work with v.35 in another end. The
> >> > > problem you meet would be something wrong in V.35 converter, I
guess.
> >> > >
> >> > > Unframed setting in v.35 converter should be correct, but there are
> >> > > should some other switches in converter. You may check with your ISP
> >> > for
> >> > > the v.35 converter setting.
> >> > >
> >> > > There are no special setting in router end, you would treat it as a
> >> > > normal link and apply the configuration what it should be.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Jerry
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> >> > Of
> >> > > Ranjith Samuel
> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:57 PM
> >> > > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >> > > Subject: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> >> > >
> >> > > Dear Experts,
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I've a query that I am sure that you will be able to help me out
> >> > > with.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I have a leased line between my two of my offices each side served
by
> >> > a
> >> > > different Service Provider with an interconnect between them. I have
> >> > > explained
> >> > > the setup Below
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Point A :
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > L2 Protocol : HDLC
> >> > >
> >> > > Interface Type : E1 Controller G.703
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Point B :
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > L2 Protocol : HDLC
> >> > >
> >> > > Interface Type : E1 Controller V.35
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > The issue is I cat get both sides to comunicate. I have tried the
> >> > > following
> >> > > combintations in terms of framing
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > 1) Unframed
> >> > >
> >> > > 2) 1-31 Time slots
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I also tried generating a network loop from the E1 Controller @
point
> >> > A
> >> > > and
> >> > > this is seen by the remote router. End to End testing has been done
> >> > > on
> >> > > the
> >> > > circuit and there are no errors.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > The Symptom is that the Serial Interface comes up but line protocol
> >> > > is
> >> > > down. I
> >> > > tried all corrective action on the cisco website.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I would also like to mention that when the service provider plus in
> >> > his
> >> > > router
> >> > > with a G.703 interface in point B, the circuit comes up with a
> >> > > channelised
> >> > > E1.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Can someone tell if both interfaces has to be of the same type for
it
> >> > to
> >> > > talk
> >> > > , or can G.703 talk to V.35 ?
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I would reallyy appreciate it if anyone can give me a lead or clue
as
> >> > to
> >> > > what
> >> > > I might be doing wrong.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Ranjith Samuel.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > _________________________________________________________________
> >> > > How fun is this? IMing with Windows Live Messenger just got better.
> >> > > http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
Received on Tue Apr 07 2009 - 14:03:06 ART