RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility

I'd like to advise have service provider provide this modem or it would
be an argue point of circuit down.

Regards,

Jerry

________________________________

From: Ranjith Samuel [mailto:ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:28 PM
To: Du, Jerry; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility

Dear Jerry,

Can the modem from the service provider take care of this conversion or
do we need to buy a specific convereter?

Regards,

Ranjith Samuel

> From: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com
> To: jerry.du_at_accenture.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:31:54 +0530
>
> Great. Thanx Jerry!! You're a life saver!!
>
> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:48:12 +0800
> > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
> > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >
> > You should have a convert at V.35 end or G.703 BNC will not able to
> > connect to. The connection would like follow:
> >
> >
> >
> > A router - E1 interface - G.703 - (Service provider) - G.703 BNC -
G.703
> > to V.35 converter - V.35 interface - B router
> >
> > |----------------- A end------------|
> > |----------------------------------B
> > end---------------------------------|
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: Ranjith Samuel [mailto:ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:31 PM
> > To: Du, Jerry; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your reply Jerry.
> >
> > So do we need a G.703 <-> V.35 conveter at either end for this
circuit
> > to work?? Wont G.703 interface talk to V.35 interface without the
> > convereter?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ranjith Samuel
> >
> > > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> > > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:10:41 +0800
> > > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
> > > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >
> > > Hi Ranjith,
> > >
> > > Yes, G.703 interface is able to work with v.35 in another end. The
> > > problem you meet would be something wrong in V.35 converter, I
guess.
> > >
> > > Unframed setting in v.35 converter should be correct, but there
are
> > > should some other switches in converter. You may check with your
ISP
> > for
> > > the v.35 converter setting.
> > >
> > > There are no special setting in router end, you would treat it as
a
> > > normal link and apply the configuration what it should be.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jerry
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
Behalf
> > Of
> > > Ranjith Samuel
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:57 PM
> > > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> > >
> > > Dear Experts,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I've a query that I am sure that you will be able to help me out
with.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have a leased line between my two of my offices each side served
by
> > a
> > > different Service Provider with an interconnect between them. I
have
> > > explained
> > > the setup Below
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Point A :
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > L2 Protocol : HDLC
> > >
> > > Interface Type : E1 Controller G.703
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Point B :
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > L2 Protocol : HDLC
> > >
> > > Interface Type : E1 Controller V.35
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The issue is I cat get both sides to comunicate. I have tried the
> > > following
> > > combintations in terms of framing
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 1) Unframed
> > >
> > > 2) 1-31 Time slots
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I also tried generating a network loop from the E1 Controller @
point
> > A
> > > and
> > > this is seen by the remote router. End to End testing has been
done on
> > > the
> > > circuit and there are no errors.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Symptom is that the Serial Interface comes up but line
protocol is
> > > down. I
> > > tried all corrective action on the cisco website.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I would also like to mention that when the service provider plus
in
> > his
> > > router
> > > with a G.703 interface in point B, the circuit comes up with a
> > > channelised
> > > E1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Can someone tell if both interfaces has to be of the same type for
it
> > to
> > > talk
> > > , or can G.703 talk to V.35 ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I would reallyy appreciate it if anyone can give me a lead or clue
as
> > to
> > > what
> > > I might be doing wrong.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ranjith Samuel.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > How fun is this? IMing with Windows Live Messenger just got
better.
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > >
> >
Received on Tue Apr 07 2009 - 15:31:45 ART