Re: MQC priority inside class-default

From: Pavel Bykov <slidersv_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:45:34 +0200

Uh... why are you using shape peak instaead of shape CIR?
shape peak will shape your traffic to 256000 bps in this case. nad you have
adaptive set to cir? this is also unnecessary, unless you have reaction
mechanism specified - react to becn

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:09 PM, naveen M S <navin.ms_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Group,
>
> Is there a difference b/n the following two configs ? My task is to give
> VOIP traffic (with DSCP=EF) of 64kbps priority on DLCI 502.
>
> *Config-1:*
>
> class-map VOIP
> match dscp ef
> !
> policy-map SHAPE_502
> class VOIP
> priority 64
> class class-default
> shape peak 128000 6400 6400
> shape adaptive 128000
> !
> map-class frame-relay DLCI_502
> service-policy SHAPE_502
> !
> interface s0/0/0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 502
> class DLCI_502
> *
> **Config-2:*
>
> class-map VOIP
> match dscp ef
> !
> policy-map LLQ
> class VOIP
> priority 64
> !
> policy-map SHAPE_502
> class class-default
> shape peak 128000 6400 6400
> shape adaptive 128000
> shape fr-voice-adapt
> service-policy LLQ
> !
> map-class frame-relay DLCI_502
> service-policy SHAPE_502
> !
> interface s0/0/0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 502
> class DLCI_502
>
> Thanks,
> Naveen.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Pavel Bykov
----------------
Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of
your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 06 2009 - 10:45:34 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:11 ART