Re: MQC priority inside class-default

From: Mohamed El Henawy <m.henawy_at_link.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:58:21 +0200

would go for the 1st.....and don't know why you put shape peak..shape
average would do

----- Original Message -----
From: "naveen M S" <navin.ms_at_gmail.com>
To: "ccielab" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 10:09 PM
Subject: MQC priority inside class-default

> Group,
>
> Is there a difference b/n the following two configs ? My task is to give
> VOIP traffic (with DSCP=EF) of 64kbps priority on DLCI 502.
>
> *Config-1:*
>
> class-map VOIP
> match dscp ef
> !
> policy-map SHAPE_502
> class VOIP
> priority 64
> class class-default
> shape peak 128000 6400 6400
> shape adaptive 128000
> !
> map-class frame-relay DLCI_502
> service-policy SHAPE_502
> !
> interface s0/0/0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 502
> class DLCI_502
> *
> **Config-2:*
>
> class-map VOIP
> match dscp ef
> !
> policy-map LLQ
> class VOIP
> priority 64
> !
> policy-map SHAPE_502
> class class-default
> shape peak 128000 6400 6400
> shape adaptive 128000
> shape fr-voice-adapt
> service-policy LLQ
> !
> map-class frame-relay DLCI_502
> service-policy SHAPE_502
> !
> interface s0/0/0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 502
> class DLCI_502
>
> Thanks,
> Naveen.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.41/2040 - Release Date: 04/03/09
17:54:00

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Apr 11 2009 - 09:58:21 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:11 ART