Re: OT : Regarding CCIE NO Association with Company

From: Radioactive Frog (pbhatkoti@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 29 2009 - 19:32:55 ART


Thanks heaps guys for your feedback.
I am going to open a case with "certsupprot" and see what their feedback is.
I will post you the outcome.

Has anyone opened a case regarding this? which one is the best -cert-support
or ccie@cisco.com ?

thanks

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:45 AM, <sheherezada@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is no reason for Cisco to pull the individual certification.
> It's not the CCIE person that breaks the rules, it's the Cisco
> partner. Besides, if the CCIE person is not officially associated
> with company X, Cisco does not even know about it.
>
> Now, about the ethics. If I was that CCIE person, my only desire
> would be that both companies know what I am going to do. If both are
> fine with this, what's the problem? Of course, the hiring company
> might have indeed some problems with Cisco, because this does break
> the rules.
>
> On the other side, this practice is not that good for the CCIE
> population, because if one Cisco partner can rent a certification, it
> will not pay a CCIE full time. Not to mention their customers will be
> deceived.
>
> Just my 2 xxx
>
> Mihai
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:02 AM, darth router <darklordrouter@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > That sounds like a good way to get fired from company X, and get your
> cert
> > pulled by cisco. It may just be me, but I don't think cisco would be too
> > happy about that circumstance specifically. That's highly unethical to
> > compete with your primary employer.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:08 ART