From: Nick Matthews (matthn@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 29 2009 - 20:09:44 ART
If you like IOS, you'll love the VG202. Think of it like a small
VG224. This means you could deploy this to a user's house and create
a VPN to your HQ. I believe you may even be able to try using the
product much like a 8xx series router, since it runs routing
protocols and has 2 FE ports.
The ATA had some problems with modems and faxing that the VG202
shouldn't have. It's pretty neat.
-nick
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Tony Edwards <tonyedwards.rs@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi GS,
>
> I gather CUCM 7.0.1 platform do support VG202 or VG 204s and I very keen to
> try them out myself over next few months once we migrate our current 5
> cluster to UC7 platform.That way , I can replace problematic ATA186s where
> some of of Analog Faxes are terminated in to.
>
> So , I am just wondering , is any one here already deployed any VG202/204 on
> UC7 platform ?
>
> If Yes , how easy or better they are when compared to ATAs. I am guessing
> that we can configure them either as MGCP or Skinny end points ?
>
> If no , then can some one suggest me the likely ETAs for them ?
>
> And also speaking of CUCM 7.0.1 , I was also keenly looking for another
> development from 4 or 5 platforms , which is configuring ISDN BRI interfaces
> as MGCP Gateways. I was told by my SE last year that , we can get this
> feature with in UC7 platform. So , I am just wondering whether or not any
> one tried this already. At this point , I do have bunch of BRIs on our IP
> Tel 5 platform , but they are all working as H323 end points.
>
> thanks
>
> tony
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:08 ART