Re: VG202 & VG204 ?

From: Radioactive Frog (pbhatkoti@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Mar 28 2009 - 13:00:06 ART


On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com>wrote:

> Tony,
> ATA-186 won't work with CCM7. I have been through this in one of the
> migration.
> I had to upgrade the latest firmware of ATA to make it working with CCm7.
>
> VG202, 204 or 224 are fully compatible wiht UC7.
>
> ATA is GUI based and VG202/224/204 are IOS based. - both will work with
> CCM7
>
> hth
> frog
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Tony Edwards <tonyedwards.rs@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi GS,
>>
>> I gather CUCM 7.0.1 platform do support VG202 or VG 204s and I very keen
>> to
>> try them out myself over next few months once we migrate our current 5
>> cluster to UC7 platform.That way , I can replace problematic ATA186s where
>> some of of Analog Faxes are terminated in to.
>>
>> So , I am just wondering , is any one here already deployed any VG202/204
>> on
>> UC7 platform ?
>>
>> If Yes , how easy or better they are when compared to ATAs. I am guessing
>> that we can configure them either as MGCP or Skinny end points ?
>>
>> If no , then can some one suggest me the likely ETAs for them ?
>>
>> And also speaking of CUCM 7.0.1 , I was also keenly looking for another
>> development from 4 or 5 platforms , which is configuring ISDN BRI
>> interfaces
>> as MGCP Gateways. I was told by my SE last year that , we can get this
>> feature with in UC7 platform. So , I am just wondering whether or not any
>> one tried this already. At this point , I do have bunch of BRIs on our IP
>> Tel 5 platform , but they are all working as H323 end points.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> tony
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:07 ART