Re: L2protocol tunnel/dot1q tunnel

From: ALL From_NJ (all.from.nj@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 09 2009 - 01:50:38 ARST

Hey Team,

This is actually a fun lab to do ... Topology:

SW1 - <--> SW3 - <--> SW4 - <--> SW2

LAb: --) Use Dot1Q tunneling, to make switch 3 and 4 disappear. ;-)

The config guide (watch the ugly word wrap):
http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3560/software/release/12.2_44_se/configuration/guide/swtunnel.html

When you enable dot1q tunneling, the port will be in access mode.

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sounds like you need to tunnel PAGP if you want an etherchannel to
> form. Can you post the relevant parts of your configs?
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:25 AM, karim jamali <karim.jamali@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi experts,
> >
> > I need to know the difference between enabling l2protocol tunnel with the
> > port set to access mode and l2protocol tunnel with the port set to
> > dot1q-tunnel mode?
> >
> > Has anyone encountered an etherchannel channel problem stating: cannot
> > bundle PAGP not enabled on the remote port.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > KJ
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj@gmail.com

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:10 ARST