From: Bogdan Sass (bogdan.sass@catc.ro)
Date: Wed Jan 28 2009 - 08:56:35 ARST
Joseph L. Brunner wrote:
>> I love when students are eager enough to do this (can you spare some great students like this!?)
>>
I also love this sort of questions - they're the kind that make you
think :)
And no, I'm not sharing those students - I'm trying to keep them all
for myself! >:) :-P
>> hmmm this sounds a lot like route reflectors... actually I teach rr this way...
>>
That is exactly what I said - however, the question is "why do we
need route-reflectors when simply choosing the peerings this way would
be sufficient?".
> Do this, make a lab to show them the use of a cluster-id and it will become apparent- all this was thought of and hashed out a long time ago ;)
>
I'm not sure what you mean by this - isn't the cluster-id relevant
only for RR configurations? Could you please elaborate a little on this?
I'm sure that this was thought of a long time ago - and I'm sure
there is a reason why this type of topology is not used. However, I was
unable to find this reason, so I turned to this list for help :)
Thank you,
-- Bogdan Sass CCAI,CCSP,JNCIA-ER,CCIE #22221 (RS) Information Systems Security Professional "Curiosity was framed - ignorance killed the cat"Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:40 ARST