From: Bogdan Sass (bogdan.sass@catc.ro)
Date: Wed Jan 28 2009 - 07:23:45 ARST
A student of mine asked me a question today. One of those questions
that seem simple, but when you think about them you realize you don't
really know the answer. So I decided to come here for some guidance :)
The question was: "Why do we need a full-mesh between _all_ the
BGP-running routers in an AS?" (we're not talking about confederations
or RRs here - just basic BGP). He proposed the following alternative:
-we have an AS with edge routers (running both iBGP and eBGP), and
transit routers (iBGP only).
-we do full-mesh BGP between the edge routers, and only connect each
transit router to each edge router.
-for 4 edge and 8 transit routers, this takes the number of BGP
connections from 12*11/2=66 to 4*3/2+8*4=38. Quite a significant change.
Try as I might, I was unable to find a topology in which his
solution would fail. I'm hoping someone more experienced with BGP could
help me...
Thank you,
-- Bogdan Sass CCAI,CCSP,JNCIA-ER,CCIE #22221 (RS) Information Systems Security Professional "Curiosity was framed - ignorance killed the cat"Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:40 ARST