no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?

From: Roger RPF (rpf@bluemail.ch)
Date: Sun Jan 25 2009 - 17:29:12 ARST

• Next message: Wouter Prins: "Re: changing default ethertype for 802.1q interfaces?"
• Previous message: Terry Vinson: "Bootcamps and Vendors"
• Next in thread: Wouter Prins: "Re: no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?"
• Maybe reply: Wouter Prins: "Re: no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?"
• Maybe reply: Jason Morris: "Re: no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?"
• Maybe reply: ben edgar: "Re: no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?"
• Maybe reply: Pavel Bykov: "Re: no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Group,

While reading the DocCD I was surprised reading on the following link step
14:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipmulti/configuration/guide/imc_basic_cf
g_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1059016

that we should configure no ip pim dm-fallback on all routers in a sparse
mode domain.

Well, my understanding is, that if I'm running sparse-mode only my router
does not fall back to dm for flooding?

Do I understand something wrong?

regards

Roger

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

• Next message: Wouter Prins: "Re: changing default ethertype for 802.1q interfaces?"
• Previous message: Terry Vinson: "Bootcamps and Vendors"
• Next in thread: Wouter Prins: "Re: no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?"
• Maybe reply: Wouter Prins: "Re: no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?"
• Maybe reply: Jason Morris: "Re: no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?"
• Maybe reply: ben edgar: "Re: no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?"
• Maybe reply: Pavel Bykov: "Re: no ip pim dm-fallback in sparse mode domain?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:40 ARST