From: Wouter Prins (wp@null0.nl)
Date: Sun Jan 25 2009 - 17:35:47 ARST
Roger,
Good point. :)
I think when you are using ip pim autorp listener that forwards (224.0.1.39
and 224.0.1.40 dense-like) , you dont need ip pim dm-fallback anymore.
2009/1/25 Roger RPF <rpf@bluemail.ch>
> Hi Group,
>
> While reading the DocCD I was surprised reading on the following link step
> 14:
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipmulti/configuration/guide/imc_basic_cf
> g_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1059016<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipmulti/configuration/guide/imc_basic_cf%0Ag_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1059016>
>
> that we should configure no ip pim dm-fallback on all routers in a sparse
> mode domain.
>
> Well, my understanding is, that if I'm running sparse-mode only my router
> does not fall back to dm for flooding?
>
> Do I understand something wrong?
>
> regards
>
> Roger
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:40 ARST