From: Joe Rinehart (jjrinehart@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 30 2008 - 15:25:23 ARST
There is sometimes an interesting difference between what you can get to
work consistently and what is Cisco supported. I misunderstood the
question, I thought what was being asked was whether the 2800 series
supported NM's...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Haroon
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 8:56 AM
To: Joe Rinehart; Joe Rinehart
Cc: Tony Varriale; Tyson Scott; Cisco certification; GAURAV MADAN; Tony
Varriale; Tyson Scott; Cisco certification; GAURAV MADAN; Tony Varriale;
Tyson Scott; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Cisco 2800s and HWICs
So, If i were to get NM-1FE2W, it would support it?
This is what cisco's website says:
Q: Which network modules are not supported on the Cisco 2811, 2821, and
2851?
A. Table 3 shows the network modules that the Cisco 2811, 2821, and 2851
routers do not support.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5854/prod_qas0900aecd80
169bd6.html
Thanks,
Haroon
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Joe Rinehart
<jjrinehart@hotmail.com>wrote:
> The 2801 does not have an NM slot but the 2811/2821/2851 certainly do...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Haroon
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 7:57 PM
> To: GAURAV MADAN
> Cc: Tony Varriale; Tyson Scott; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Cisco 2800s and HWICs
>
> As far as I can tell from Cisco's website, NM modules are not supported on
> 2800s... or do they just want customers to buy HWICs?
>
> Thank you
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:26 PM, GAURAV MADAN
> <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > PLease note that convertible port ( L2 ; L3 using a no switchport /
> > switchport command ) is not available on HWICs.
> > HWIC will be either L2 ( like 4ESW ; HWIC-D-9ESW ) or L3 ( like HWIC-1FE
> > and
> > HWIC-2FE)
> >
> > For things that u wish ; please take a moment to look in NMs available .
> >
> > However I am not sure abt cost and what budget u have ..
> >
> > Gaurav Madan.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Tony Varriale
> > <tvarriale@flamboyaninc.com>wrote:
> >
> > > With "no switchport", that would infer a router interface not a
> > switchport.
> > > That feature is not supported on the HWIC.
> > >
> > > And FYI, those old 6500 days aren't gone.
> > >
> > > tv
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Tyson Scott
> > > Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 6:12 PM
> > > To: Tony Varriale
> > > Cc: Hobbs; Cisco certification
> > > Subject: Re: Cisco 2800s and HWICs
> > >
> > > Tony,
> > >
> > > I guess all I am saying is configure the port as a layer2 port and
> > > configure the layer3 interface.
> > >
> > > Just the same way as the old hybrid 6500 days.
> > >
> > > RTR#sh run int f0/3/0
> > > interface FastEthernet0/3/0
> > > switchport trunk native vlan 200
> > > switchport mode trunk
> > > switchport voice vlan 400
> > > end
> > >
> > > RTR#sh ip int brief
> > > Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> > > Protocol
> > > FastEthernet0/3/0 unassigned YES unset up
> > > up
> > > FastEthernet0/3/1 unassigned YES unset up
> > > down
> > > FastEthernet0/3/2 unassigned YES unset up
> > > down
> > > FastEthernet0/3/3 unassigned YES unset up
> > > down
> > > Vlan200 10.10.102.1 YES manual up
> > > up
> > > Vlan400 10.10.202.1 YES manual up
> > > up
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Tony Varriale
> > > <tvarriale@flamboyaninc.com> wrote:
> > > > Not going to happen. They are l2 only.
> > > >
> > > > tv
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of
> > > > Hobbs
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 5:57 PM
> > > > To: Haroon
> > > > Cc: Cisco certification
> > > > Subject: Re: Cisco 2800s and HWICs
> > > >
> > > > If cost is an issue I would check get the hwic-4esw if it allows "no
> > > > switchport". I don't have one to verify. If it's for lab purposes it
> > > should
> > > > be fine. An online rack I use has a 2800 with a nm-16esw and it
> allows
> > > the
> > > > no switchport command.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone here know?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Haroon <itguy.pro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Thanks Hobbs.
> > > >>
> > > >> I was just looking at those documents.
> > > >>
> > > >> It seems HWIC-1FE would be a better option but are bit expensive
> > > though,
> > > >> is anybody selling HWIC-1FE, I need 4 or 5 pieces?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Haroon
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5854/products_relevant_interfaces_and_
> > > > modules.html
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5854/product_data_sheet
> > > > 0900aecd80581fe6_ps5853_Products_Data_Sheet.html
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I believe the switch module interfaces can be converted to routed
> > ports
> > > >>> with the "no switchport" command. Don't know if all the switch
> > modules
> > > >>> support it though. Otherwise take a look at the links above for
> > > HWIC-1FE.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> hth
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Haroon <itguy.pro@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hello Experts,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I have couple of 2811s and few 2821s. I need to add 2 additional
> > > >>>> Fast-Ethernet interfaces on each of these routers, what is the
> best
> > > way
> > > >>>> to
> > > >>>> go about doing that? Which module (part#?) would allow layer3
> > > > capability?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I understand HWIC-4ESW would but isn't that a switch which
doesn't
> > > > really
> > > >>>> do
> > > >>>> routing on it self but forwards it to the host?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Please help.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Haroon
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:10 ARST