From: Shawn Zandi (szmetal@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 18 2008 - 08:32:09 ARST
yes, depends on box, pps and bandwidth, but works fine for me on serial
links.--
Sincerely,
Shawn Zandi
Routing, Switching & Security Consultant - CCIE
Dubai Internet City - Building 13
web: http://www.shafagh.com
email: shafagh@shafagh.com
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Andrew Larkins
<Andrew.Larkins@bytes.co.za>wrote:
> Does that not result in a rather large CPU spike b depending on the
> interface loading..?
>
>
>
> *From:* Shawn Zandi [mailto:szmetal@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 18 December 2008 12:16 PM
> *To:* Hooman Parta; Shaughn Smith
> *Cc:* Andrew Larkins; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> *Subject:* Re: Load Balancing between Serial ports
>
>
>
> Hooman,
>
> CEF can do it with your same AD static routes, if traffic is between same
> pair of src/dst, configure it per packet (*ip load-sharing per-packet)*
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0/switch/configuration/guide/xccefc.html
>
>
>
> there was a limitation for number of CEF entires, cant remember now (based
> on nexthop) ... if bandwidth is different between links I would go for
> bandwidth-proportinal loadbalancing with bgp dmzlink-bw
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> Shawn Zandi
> Routing, Switching & Security Consultant - CCIE
> Dubai Internet City - Building 13
> web: http://www.shafagh.com
> email: shafagh@shafagh.com
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Shaughn Smith <
> Shaughn.Smith@za.verizonbusiness.com> wrote:
>
> After I typed my e-mail I thought about MLPPP
>
> Would be the "better" way to go, but like you say, depends on the topology
>
>
>
>
>
> The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
> this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from any system and destroy any copies.
>
>
> The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
> this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from any system and destroy any copies.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:09 ARST