From: Pavel Bykov (slidersv@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2008 - 14:23:32 ARST
Is it not going to be a multicast issue, when multicast address used by
EIGRP is required to have TTL=1, and because it's connected over switch,
multicasts can travel one way, but the other way they require TTL of 2.
Therefore you'd have to use either L2 tunnelling or "neighbor" command for
unicast communication.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was using a different rack vendor. I did not copy the configs. I figured
> I'll start from scratch next time.
>
> Here is what I saved:
> - Hide quoted text -
> RSRack1R5(config-if)#do sri f0/0
> Building configuration...
> Current configuration : 95 bytes
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 183.1.105.5 255.255.255.0
> duplex full
> speed 100
> end
>
> RSRack1SW1(config)#do sri f0/5
> Building configuration...
> Current configuration : 109 bytes
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/5
> switchport access vlan 105
> switchport mode access
> speed 100
> duplex full
> end
> On the topology map R5 F0/0 connects to sw4 f0/18
> SRack1SW4(config-router)# do sri f0/18
> Building configuration...
> Current configuration : 88 bytes
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/18
> no switchport
> ip address 183.1.105.10 255.255.255.0
> end
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Omkar Tambalkar
> <omkar.groupstudy@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Doh...I was reading the string half-way and got side-tracked when I just
> > saw MTU related messages. By the way I did the same lab yesterday and I
> did
> > not have the same issue. I was using CCOnlinelabs.com. Did you copy the
> > configs before exiting the lab?
> > BTW, was the interface vlan 105 up/up on the switch that had the IP
> address
> > configured for that SVI? This can be a good L2 troubleshooting exercise.
> >
> > - Omkar
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:53 AM, Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Omkar
> >>
> >> I ran out of rack time and I was not able to figure it out. I will try
> and
> >> recreate the issue in dynamips.
> >>
> >> I could not use ip ospf mtu-ignore because I was having an issue with
> >> EIGRP. Is there a similar command for EIGRP?
> >>
> >> Before I ran out of time I removed routing and set the trunks to default
> >> passing all vlans.
> >>
> >> It was an odd issue. I was able to configure sw1 f0/5 as a routed port
> and
> >> I could ping 183.1.105.5 and vise versa but one I set the port as an
> >> access port for vlan 105 I was not able to ping 183.1.105.5 anymore. I
> >> set all the switches to the same domain and made them all transparent. I
> >> build vlan 105 on all 4 switches. Sw4's f0/18 is a routed port.
> >>
> >> I set the system MTU on the switches and hard coded the trunks and
> router
> >> to switch connections.
> >>
> >> It's a layer 2 issue somewhere in the path.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Omkar Tambalkar <
> >> omkar.groupstudy@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is this still an issue?
> >>>
> >>> Have you tried ip ospf mtu-ignore on the switch/router interfaces that
> >>> are forming the adjacency?
> >>>
> >>> - Omkar
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I removed routing and checked my trunks. Everything looks ok.
> >>>>
> >>>> On sw1 f0/5 I added 183.1.105.55/24 and I could ping that from R5.
> >>>>
> >>>> I ran out of rack time......
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks everyone.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > As a side note you should have verified that R5 and SW4 could ping
> >>>> each
> >>>> > other before moving on to routing. I learn the hard way too :)
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> Are you sure that SW4 f0/18 is connected to SW1 f0/15...?There
> seems
> >>>> to be
> >>>> >> another switch involved because SW1 is trunking on f0/15....show
> cdp
> >>>> >> neighbor, something funny's going on
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>> SW4 > R5 - layer 2 path
> >>>> >>> sw4 f0/15 > sw1 f0/21 > r5 f0/0
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>> Let's focus on the basics.
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> You said "From R5 I can not ping 183.1.105.10."
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> SW1 as far as I can tell is not routing between SW4 and R5 so we
> do
> >>>> not
> >>>> >>>> care about its routing table or whether it can ping any address.
> >>>> Sw4 and R5
> >>>> >>>> should have a layer 2 path somewhere. What is that path?
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> Solve this issue first.
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW1(config)#do sho int trunk
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native
> vlan
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/13 on 802.1q trunking 46
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/15 on 802.1q trunking 46
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/21 on 802.1q trunking 1
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Port Vlans allowed on trunk
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/13 1-4094
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/15 1-4094
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/21 1-4094
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/13 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/15 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/21 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not
> pruned
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/13 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/15 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/21 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW1(config)#
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW4(config-if)#do sho int trunk
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native
> vlan
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/15 on 802.1q trunking 1
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/19 on 802.1q trunking 46
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/20 on 802.1q trunking 46
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Port Vlans allowed on trunk
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/15 1-4094
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/19 1-4094
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/20 1-4094
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/15 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/19 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/20 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not
> pruned
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/15 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/19 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>> Fa0/20 1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW4(config-if)#do sho cdp nei
> >>>> >>>>> Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route
> >>>> Bridge
> >>>> >>>>> S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater,
> P
> >>>> -
> >>>> >>>>> Phone
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Capability
> >>>> >>>>> Platform Port ID
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW3 Fas 0/20 132 S I
> >>>> >>>>> WS-C3550-2Fas 0/20
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW3 Fas 0/19 132 S I
> >>>> >>>>> WS-C3550-2Fas 0/19
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW3 Fas 0/21 132 S I
> >>>> >>>>> WS-C3550-2Fas 0/21
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW2 Fas 0/18 157 R S I
> >>>> >>>>> WS-C3560-2Fas 0/21
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW1 Fas 0/15 158 R S I
> >>>> >>>>> WS-C3560-2Fas 0/21
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1R4 Fas 0/4 165 R S I
> >>>> >>>>> 2811 Fas 0/1
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1R6 Fas 0/6 165 R S I
> >>>> >>>>> 2811 Fas 0/1
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW1(config)#do ping 183.1.105.10
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Type escape sequence to abort.
> >>>> >>>>> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 183.1.105.10, timeout is 2
> >>>> seconds:
> >>>> >>>>> !!!!!
> >>>> >>>>> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max =
> 1/1/1
> >>>> ms
> >>>> >>>>> RSRack1SW1(config)#do ping 183.1.105.5
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Type escape sequence to abort.
> >>>> >>>>> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 183.1.105.5, timeout is 2
> >>>> seconds:
> >>>> >>>>> .....
> >>>> >>>>> Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> R5 F0/0 has a physical connection to sw f0/5
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> RSRack1R5(config-if)#do sri f0/0
> >>>> >>>>>> Building configuration...
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> Current configuration : 95 bytes
> >>>> >>>>>> !
> >>>> >>>>>> interface FastEthernet0/0
> >>>> >>>>>> ip address 183.1.105.5 255.255.255.0
> >>>> >>>>>> duplex full
> >>>> >>>>>> speed 100
> >>>> >>>>>> end
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> RSRack1SW1(config)#do sri f0/5
> >>>> >>>>>> Building configuration...
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> Current configuration : 109 bytes
> >>>> >>>>>> !
> >>>> >>>>>> interface FastEthernet0/5
> >>>> >>>>>> switchport access vlan 105
> >>>> >>>>>> switchport mode access
> >>>> >>>>>> speed 100
> >>>> >>>>>> duplex full
> >>>> >>>>>> end
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> On the topology map R5 F0/0 connects to sw4 f0/18
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> SRack1SW4(config-router)# do sri f0/18
> >>>> >>>>>> Building configuration...
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> Current configuration : 88 bytes
> >>>> >>>>>> !
> >>>> >>>>>> interface FastEthernet0/18
> >>>> >>>>>> no switchport
> >>>> >>>>>> ip address 183.1.105.10 255.255.255.0
> >>>> >>>>>> end
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> RSRack1SW1(config-if)#do sho ip route 183.1.105.5
> >>>> >>>>>>> Routing entry for 183.1.105.0/24
> >>>> >>>>>>> Known via "eigrp 100", distance 90, metric 30720, type
> >>>> internal
> >>>> >>>>>>> Redistributing via eigrp 100
> >>>> >>>>>>> Last update from 183.1.107.10 on FastEthernet0/14, 00:20:27
> >>>> ago
> >>>> >>>>>>> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> >>>> >>>>>>> * 183.1.107.10, from 183.1.107.10, 00:20:27 ago, via
> >>>> >>>>>>> FastEthernet0/14
> >>>> >>>>>>> Route metric is 30720, traffic share count is 1
> >>>> >>>>>>> Total delay is 200 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is
> >>>> 100000
> >>>> >>>>>>> Kbit
> >>>> >>>>>>> Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
> >>>> >>>>>>> Loading 1/255, Hops 1
> >>>> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> RSRack1SW1(config-if)#do sho ip route 183.1.105.10
> >>>> >>>>>>> Routing entry for 183.1.105.0/24
> >>>> >>>>>>> Known via "eigrp 100", distance 90, metric 30720, type
> >>>> internal
> >>>> >>>>>>> Redistributing via eigrp 100
> >>>> >>>>>>> Last update from 183.1.107.10 on FastEthernet0/14, 00:20:31
> >>>> ago
> >>>> >>>>>>> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> >>>> >>>>>>> * 183.1.107.10, from 183.1.107.10, 00:20:31 ago, via
> >>>> >>>>>>> FastEthernet0/14
> >>>> >>>>>>> Route metric is 30720, traffic share count is 1
> >>>> >>>>>>> Total delay is 200 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is
> >>>> 100000
> >>>> >>>>>>> Kbit
> >>>> >>>>>>> Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
> >>>> >>>>>>> Loading 1/255, Hops 1
> >>>> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Narbik Kocharians <
> >>>> narbikk@gmail.com
> >>>> >>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>> Can you show us the configuration of the interfaces.
> >>>> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Hobbs <
> deadheadblues@gmail.com
> >>>> >wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> What is the mask of each interface?
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Hobbs <
> >>>> deadheadblues@gmail.com>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > When does it happen? After you change a parameter? I think
> I
> >>>> have
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> seen the
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > issue that Bob talked about with the goodbye message
> causing
> >>>> a
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> K-value
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > mismatch....It looks like you are getting the K-value
> >>>> mismatch,
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> then your
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > adjacency is forming. This means your adjacency was
> brought
> >>>> down
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> for some
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > reason - maybe you configured a summary or secondary
> >>>> address...
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > Example: I had an initial config with a mistake (on
> >>>> purpose). One
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> router on
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > a LAN with /24 and the other with /20 mask. After I
> >>>> configured
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> the /20 for a
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > /24, EIGRP sent a goodbye and the other router complained
> >>>> about a
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> K-value
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > mismatch. The adjacency then came up fine.
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > I wonder if its a code issue...I am always running 12.4...
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> On the routers I left the MTU at default,m 1500. On the
> >>>> switches
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> (3550/3560)
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> I set the system MTU to 1500 (system MTU 1500 or system
> MTU
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> routing 1500.
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> Where allowed on the interface I set ip mtu 1500).
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> Debugs don't show me anything. I was looking to shut the
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> messages off with
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> a
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> command similar to ip ospf mtu-ignore but I don't see one
> >>>> under
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> interface.
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> I can try and set the metric for all devices in the AS
> and
> >>>> see
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> what
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> happens.
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Bob Sinclair <
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> bob@bobsinclair.net> wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> > Piotr,
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> > Check that the MTUs match on both devices. I notice
> one
> >>>> is a
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> switch.
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> > Though the specs do not require equal MTU (like OSPF
> >>>> does)
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Cisco
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> routers
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> > have been known to drop EIGRP packets over MTU mismatch
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> issues.
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> > The K-value mismatch error can be caused when the near
> >>>> side
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> router does
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> not
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> > support the "goodbye" message, added around 12.2(3),
> but
> >>>> the
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> far side
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> does.
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> > HTH,
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> > Bob Sinclair CCIE 10427 CCSI 30427
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> > www.netmasterclass.net
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> > Piotr wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Switch:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 05:04:04: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.105.5(FastEthernet0/18) is up: new adjacency
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> --More--
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 05:05:23: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.105.5(FastEthernet0/18) is down: K-value
> mismatch
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> --More--
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 05:05:26: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.105.5(FastEthernet0/18) is up: new adjacency
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> router eigrp 100
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> network 183.1.105.10 0.0.0.0
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> network 183.1.107.10 0.0.0.0
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> no auto-summary
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> eigrp router-id 150.1.10.10
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> interface FastEthernet0/18
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> no switchport
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> ip address 183.1.105.10 255.255.255.0
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Routing Protocol is "eigrp 100"
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not
> >>>> set
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not
> >>>> set
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Default networks accepted from incoming updates
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> EIGRP maximum hopcount 100
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> EIGRP maximum metric variance 1
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Redistributing: eigrp 100
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> EIGRP NSF-aware route hold timer is 240s
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Automatic network summarization is not in effect
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Maximum path: 4
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Routing for Networks:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.105.10/32
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.107.10/32
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Routing Information Sources:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Gateway Distance Last Update
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.107.7 90 00:07:43
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Distance: internal 90 external 170
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> router:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> *Nov 2 13:55:54.926: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0)
> >>>> 100:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Neighbor
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.105.10 (FastEthernet0/0) is down: retry limit
> >>>> exceeded
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> RSRack1R5(config-router)#
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> *Nov 2 13:55:57.322: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0)
> >>>> 100:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Neighbor
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.105.10 (FastEthernet0/0) is up: new adjacency
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> RSRack1R5(config-router)#
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> *Nov 2 13:57:16.834: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0)
> >>>> 100:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Neighbor
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.105.10 (FastEthernet0/0) is down: retry limit
> >>>> exceeded
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> RSRack1R5(config-router)#
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> *Nov 2 13:57:20.290: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0)
> >>>> 100:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Neighbor
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.105.10 (FastEthernet0/0) is up: new adjacency
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> router eigrp 100
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> network 183.1.105.5 0.0.0.0
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> no auto-summary
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> eigrp router-id 150.1.5.5
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> interface FastEthernet0/0
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> ip address 183.1.105.5 255.255.255.0
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> duplex auto
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> speed auto
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Routing Protocol is "eigrp 100"
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not
> >>>> set
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not
> >>>> set
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Default networks accepted from incoming updates
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> EIGRP maximum hopcount 100
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> EIGRP maximum metric variance 1
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Redistributing: eigrp 100
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> EIGRP NSF-aware route hold timer is 240s
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Automatic network summarization is not in effect
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Maximum path: 4
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Routing for Networks:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.105.5/32
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Routing Information Sources:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Gateway Distance Last Update
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> 183.1.105.10 90 00:09:49
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Distance: internal 90 external 170
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>> >>>>>>>> Narbik Kocharians
> >>>> >>>>>>>> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> >>>> >>>>>>>> www.MicronicsTraining
> >>>> >>>>>>>> www.Net-Workbooks.com <http://www.net-workbooks.com/>
> >>>> >>>>>>>> Sr. Technical Instructor
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Pavel Bykov ------------------------------------------------- Stop the braindumps! http://www.stopbraindumps.com/Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:29 ARST