Re: Factoring performance metrics in Active Route Selection

From: john edward (john4edward@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Oct 23 2008 - 05:52:28 ARST


Hi Greg,

I had already looked into performance routing and optimised edge routing but
these 2 have limitations in that they only work for small networks and are
restricted to just
bgp and static routes.

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Greg Wendel <gwendel@gmail.com> wrote:

> You may want to look into PFR or OER whatever Cisco is calling it now.
> Performance based routing or Optimal edge routing. Don't have any links
> handy.
>
> Greg, #20179
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:50 PM, john edward <john4edward@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Gents,
>>
>> Does anyone know how to factor in end-to-end link performance metrics such
>> as delay, reliability , jitter etc into dynamic route selection?
>>
>> Forexample, if there are two routes from a router to a destination
>> network
>> with the same metric learned via EIGRP, for instance. How would one
>> configure the router such that if one of the links becomes degraded
>> somewhere within the service provider cloud, then the metric should
>> increase
>> so only the more stable route is installed into the routing table.
>>
>> Some possible options would be performance routing and optimised edge
>> routing but these only work for small networks and are restricted to just
>> bgp and static routes.
>>
>> Any ideas would be really appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gregory Wendel
> Springfield VA, 22153

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:22 ARST