Re: Question about Initial Config in the LAB

From: Asif (asif@vanoo.com)
Date: Sun Oct 12 2008 - 12:45:33 ART


You should expect faults in the initial config.

Asif

Jason Madsen wrote:
> Although getting the wrong initial config's altogether is a possibility, I
> believe Reza was referring to "faults in initial config'". Can/will there
> be faults that we are supposed to find and correct even if there is no
> section in the lab mentioning faults?
>
> Jason
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Jared Scrivener <jscrivener@ipexpert.com>wrote:
>
>
>> Yes, it is a MUST, Reza.
>>
>> There is always a chance that the proctors loaded the wrong configs, so
>> check the addressing on every interface.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Reza
>> Toghraee
>> Sent: Sunday, 12 October 2008 10:51 AM
>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Question about Initial Config in the LAB
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>>
>>
>> My question is about initial configuration.
>>
>> Is it a MUST to check the initial configuration and compare it to the
>> diagram even if they didn't mentioned about faults in initial config?
>>
>> Do we have right to change or correct the initial config according to the
>> topology?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Reza Toghraee
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:20 ARST