From: Jason Madsen (madsen.jason@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Oct 12 2008 - 12:39:58 ART
Although getting the wrong initial config's altogether is a possibility, I
believe Reza was referring to "faults in initial config'". Can/will there
be faults that we are supposed to find and correct even if there is no
section in the lab mentioning faults?
Jason
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Jared Scrivener <jscrivener@ipexpert.com>wrote:
> Yes, it is a MUST, Reza.
>
> There is always a chance that the proctors loaded the wrong configs, so
> check the addressing on every interface.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Reza
> Toghraee
> Sent: Sunday, 12 October 2008 10:51 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Question about Initial Config in the LAB
>
> Hello.
>
>
>
> My question is about initial configuration.
>
> Is it a MUST to check the initial configuration and compare it to the
> diagram even if they didn't mentioned about faults in initial config?
>
> Do we have right to change or correct the initial config according to the
> topology?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Reza Toghraee
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:20 ARST