RE: Repost : IP NBMA MODE Question

From: Mark Stephanus Chandra (mark.chandra@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Oct 05 2008 - 21:30:11 ART

No Hobss,

 

R3 using serial Interface , no sub interface and it is a multipoint
interface.

 

Regards

 

Mark Stephanus Chandra
IT Consultant

 

From: Hobbs [mailto:deadheadblues@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 Oktober 2008 7:18
To: Mark Stephanus Chandra
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Repost : IP NBMA MODE Question

 

Is R3 using separate point-to-point sub-interfaces for connections to R1 and
R2? That would be my first guess.

On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Mark Stephanus Chandra
<mark.chandra@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Mark Stephanus Chandra [mailto:mark.chandra@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 Oktober 2008 13:42
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: IP NBMA MODE Question

Dear GS,

I'm coming on my lab 9 workbook, still confuse with multicast.

So The question is like this

Diagram :

http://s481.photobucket.com/albums/rr171/mark_chandra/?action=view
<http://s481.photobucket.com/albums/rr171/mark_chandra/?action=view¤t=
MCASTQST.jpg> &current=M
CASTQST.jpg

The IEWB Workbook told to test a multicast group 224.1.1.1 connection from
VLAN 7 to R4 and R5.

So R4 and R5 ethernet is joining Group 224.1.1.1.

And the solustion also use ip PIM NBMA-MODE on R5 Serial frame-relay
connection.

The Question is, Why R3 connection to R1 and R2 doesn't have to use ip pim
nbma-mode ?

Still confuse when to use Ip Pim NBMA-MOde,

Please need you guys help on this.

Thanks a lot

Best Regards,

Mark Stephanus Chandra

IT-Network

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:19 ARST