From: Hobbs (deadheadblues@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Oct 05 2008 - 21:17:43 ART
Is R3 using separate point-to-point sub-interfaces for connections to R1 and
R2? That would be my first guess.
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Mark Stephanus Chandra <
mark.chandra@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Mark Stephanus Chandra [mailto:mark.chandra@gmail.com]
> Sent: 05 Oktober 2008 13:42
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: IP NBMA MODE Question
>
>
>
> Dear GS,
>
>
>
> I'm coming on my lab 9 workbook, still confuse with multicast.
>
>
>
> So The question is like this
>
>
>
> Diagram :
>
>
>
>
> http://s481.photobucket.com/albums/rr171/mark_chandra/?action=view¤t=M
> CASTQST.jpg<http://s481.photobucket.com/albums/rr171/mark_chandra/?action=view¤t=MCASTQST.jpg>
>
>
>
>
>
> The IEWB Workbook told to test a multicast group 224.1.1.1 connection from
> VLAN 7 to R4 and R5.
>
>
>
> So R4 and R5 ethernet is joining Group 224.1.1.1.
>
> And the solustion also use ip PIM NBMA-MODE on R5 Serial frame-relay
> connection.
>
>
>
> The Question is, Why R3 connection to R1 and R2 doesn't have to use ip pim
> nbma-mode ?
>
>
>
> Still confuse when to use Ip Pim NBMA-MOde,
>
>
>
> Please need you guys help on this.
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Mark Stephanus Chandra
>
> IT-Network
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:19 ARST
