From: Scott Vermillion (scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com)
Date: Wed Sep 03 2008 - 15:26:37 ART
I thought for some odd reason that this sounded vaguely familiar, so I
checked the IE Forums archive to see if I had posted anything under Lab 13,
Task 3.7. Although it turns out that I didn't (what a joke that I would
have remembered some detail like that from last year!), I did find the
following post:
"Yes, it doesn't work correctly.
We are in process of fixing the issues now."
Maxim Kurushkin, CCIE #17639 (R&S/SP)
----@internetworkexpert.com
http://forum.internetworkexpert.com/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/15172
/page/1#Post15172
And also:
http://forum.internetworkexpert.com/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/15106
/page/3#Post15106
Not sure if that's of any value to anyone or not but I thought I would go
ahead and post it up since I had navigated there...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Anand 1871
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 9:37 PM
To: Julio Carrasco
Cc: Lloyd Ardoin; Marc La Porte; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IEWB Vol 2 lab 13 task 3.7, OSPF distance command
The exact same thing happened with me too. But I am not too sure whether it
is a bug.
When I shut down the R5-R2 link, the distance changes to the configured
value. But then when I reenable it, distance is back at 110.
On 8/30/08, Julio Carrasco <julio.carrasco@ya.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc and Lloyd,
>
> I can see changed the prefixes 139.1.11.0, 139.1.6.0 and 139.1.7.0, but
> not 139.1.2.0. Seems to be a bug O_O.
>
> Thank you both for your help ;).
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lloyd Ardoin" <Lloyd@TheWizKid.biz>
> To: "Julio Carrasco" <julio.carrasco@ya.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 8:49 PM
> Subject: RE: IEWB Vol 2 lab 13 task 3.7, OSPF distance command
>
>
> Hi Julio,
>>
>> that is interesting that you had similar results that I had. I actually
>> had
>> one of the prefixes I believe the .11 that the distance changed on but
>> ther
>> rest did not. I tried it serveral times but could never get the distances
>> to
>> change so I gave up and used summarization to meet the objective. If you
>> find
>> the answer I would be interested in that also.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Lloyd V Ardoin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Julio Carrasco
>> Sent: Fri 8/29/2008 12:16 PM
>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: IEWB Vol 2 lab 13 task 3.7, OSPF distance command
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have issued the next commands:
>> router ospf 1
>> distance 109 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 1
>> !
>> access-list 1 permit 139.1.2.0
>> access-list 1 permit 139.1.6.0
>> access-list 1 permit 139.1.7.0
>> access-list 1 permit 139.1.11.0
>>
>> But I still seeing the routes that configured on the
>> access-list with distance 110. I hcecked the IEWB solution, and they did
>> the
>> same but with an standard named ACL.
>>
>> Could any one help me to figure out why isn4t working the distance
>> command.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Julio Carrasco.
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:17 ART