From: Dayaa Al Zoubi (cciecool@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 04 2008 - 17:24:38 ART
Ok , the tunnel source and destination will be the wan interfaces and then
Have the tunnel ip on the same range and advertize it in IGP
Does it make sense?
Try It ..
Thanks
Dayaa
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com> wrote:
> hmmm....curious...how would tunneling help BB1 get to the network?
>
> I see how NAT could work, we would just NAT all addresses at R1 fa0/0, but
> not sure about tunneling....
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Dayaa Al Zoubi <cciecool@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tunneling
>> Dayaa
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:57 PM, akyccie <akyccie@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > R1 is connected to BB1 over ethernet (R1 fa0/0 -10.1.1.1 and BB1
>> > fa0/0-10.1.1.254). scenario doesn't ask to configure any routing
>> protocol
>> > between R1 and BB1 so how to reach BB1 (10.1.1.254) from the routers
>> > behind
>> > the R1 to have the full reachability.
>> >
>> > One option I can think of is use NAT, is there any other way ???
>> >
>> > -aky
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:29 ART