From: Hobbs (deadheadblues@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 04 2008 - 17:04:06 ART
hmmm....curious...how would tunneling help BB1 get to the network?
I see how NAT could work, we would just NAT all addresses at R1 fa0/0, but
not sure about tunneling....
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Dayaa Al Zoubi <cciecool@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tunneling
> Dayaa
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:57 PM, akyccie <akyccie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > R1 is connected to BB1 over ethernet (R1 fa0/0 -10.1.1.1 and BB1
> > fa0/0-10.1.1.254). scenario doesn't ask to configure any routing protocol
> > between R1 and BB1 so how to reach BB1 (10.1.1.254) from the routers
> > behind
> > the R1 to have the full reachability.
> >
> > One option I can think of is use NAT, is there any other way ???
> >
> > -aky
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:29 ART