From: Jason Madsen (madsen.jason@gmail.com)
Date: Sat May 10 2008 - 11:23:43 ART
correct, a virtual link doesn't seem appropriate here. Kebram, I think you
meant that the discontiguous area 5s are seeing each other as inter-area
routes and not intra-area routes, right? each area 5 should end up being
it's own unique area unless a tunnel is used.
Jason
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Ibrahim kabir <kebramccie@live.com> wrote:
> Ahmed,
>
> neva thought about this type of design at all. bt i labbed it and it worked
> without gre or virtual-links. The main thing to look out for is that each
> area
> should be connected to the backbone area (Area 0). and looking at your
> diagram the condition is true. only that the discontigious area 5's see
> each
> others routes as intra-area routes.
> Lab it and see for urself.
> cheers,
> kebram
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 13:30:06 +0300> From: eng.ahmedbadr@gmail.com>
> To:
> ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: OSPF areas> > Dears,> > according to the
> diagram below, should I link area 5 in the two sides by any> mean (eg
> tunnel)
> or it should work fine.> > > > Area5 Area0 Area5> -------------------
> ----------- ------------------> - - - - - -> - --R1-----------
> R2------------R3------------R4-- -> - - - - - -> -------------------
> ----------- -------------------> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________>
> Subscription information may be found at: >
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live
> Spaces.
> It's easy!
>
> http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&m
> kt=en-us
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:16 ART