From: Ibrahim kabir (kebramccie@live.com)
Date: Sat May 10 2008 - 15:38:17 ART
yeah jason i meant OI i.e inter-area routes. The terms keep confusing me
inter(btween areas) and intra(within same) area.Kabir K IbrahimB.sc CCNA CCNP
CCDP CCNP MCP+2348036477283> Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 08:23:43 -0600> From:
madsen.jason@gmail.com> To: kebramccie@live.com> Subject: Re: OSPF areas> CC:
eng.ahmedbadr@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com> > correct, a virtual link
doesn't seem appropriate here. Kebram, I think you> meant that the
discontiguous area 5s are seeing each other as inter-area> routes and not
intra-area routes, right? each area 5 should end up being> it's own unique
area unless a tunnel is used.> > Jason> > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 6:15 AM,
Ibrahim kabir <kebramccie@live.com> wrote:> > > Ahmed,> >> > neva thought
about this type of design at all. bt i labbed it and it worked> > without gre
or virtual-links. The main thing to look out for is that each> > area> >
should be connected to the backbone area (Area 0). and looking at your> >
diagram the condition is true. only that the discontigious area 5's see> >
each> > others routes as intra-area routes.> > Lab it and see for urself.> >
cheers,> > kebram> >> >> > > Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 13:30:06 +0300> From:
eng.ahmedbadr@gmail.com>> > To:> > ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: OSPF
areas> > Dears,> > according to the> > diagram below, should I link area 5 in
the two sides by any> mean (eg> > tunnel)> > or it should work fine.> > > >
Area5 Area0 Area5> -------------------> > ----------- ------------------> - -
- - - -> - --R1-----------> > R2------------R3------------R4-- -> - - - - - ->
-------------------> > ----------- -------------------> > >> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:16 ART