RE: HSRP

From: mohamed ouamer (mohamedouamer@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Apr 04 2008 - 19:01:37 ART


Hi Ram & sadiq,

Thank you.> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:58:20 +0100> From: sadiqtanko@gmail.com>
To: rshummoo@ca.ibm.com> Subject: Re: HSRP> CC: mohamedouamer@hotmail.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com> > Hi Mo,> > Just to add a
little more flesh to what Ram has said: So you configure> HSRP. You make one
the Active with the higher priority. If you are not> tracking any interface,
you dont really need to configure pre-emption,> because the router with the
higher priority will always be the Active.> If this router goes down, the
Standby takes over.> > If for any reason, the router with the higher priority
comes back> online, without any preemption enabled, it would'nt become the
Active> router. It now becomes your Standby.> > When you configure tracking,
then you need preemtion, for the Standby> router to take over the role of
Active when the interface you are> tracking on the Active router fails, which
keep decrementing the> priority, until a point is reached when the Standby's
priority is> higher than the Active's, in which case a coup de'tat takes
place.> > Anyways, let me allow you be now :)> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:50 ART