From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 03 2008 - 16:16:40 ART
I agree with you Joe. One must not underestimate the QoS requirements. Those
conversion techniques you mentioned are worth the time.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Brunner" <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
To: "'Vinod Lodhi'" <vinodlodhi@airtelmail.in>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 6:16 PM
Subject: RE: QoS in Lab exam
> >As far to answer the QoS question in LAB exam will not be a problem.
>
> Are you sure?
>
> I would still read the Doc CD QoS, about 10 times before I wagered that.
> And
> I mean everything from switch SRR/WRR to the 12.4 QOS configuration
> guides,
> etc.
>
> But is there any specific
> procedure to be followed between Legacy and MQC or we free to choose any.
>
> The IEWB VOL II. (20 labs) has some specific legacy to MQC conversion
> techniques. I suppose learning those would come in handy. Brian and Brian
> made all those issues really clear in that workbook.
>
> -Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Vinod Lodhi
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 1:06 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: QoS in Lab exam
>
> Hi folks..
>
>
>
> I've just completed QoS part from IEWB CoD. As far to answer the QoS
> question in LAB exam will not be a problem. But is there any specific
> procedure to be followed between Legacy and MQC or we free to choose any.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance..
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Vinod
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:50 ART