From: Mike Haddad (mike.haddad@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2008 - 04:28:15 ART
If you look at the below ACL 50 you will find that it already encompensates all the list.
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:31:48 +0530From: thekonqueror@gmail.comTo: mike.haddad@hotmail.comSubject: Re: Multicast GroupingCC: ccielab@groupstudy.comGrouping the access lists as 226.0.0.0 12.255.255.255 will also allow following groups:227.0.0.1229.0.0.1231.0.0.1233.0.0.1234.0.0.1235.0.0.1237.0.0.1If the task says, configure rp for ONLY given groups, then the 1 line acl cannot be used. I'd ask proctor for clarification on this.Thanks,Rahul
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Mike Haddad <mike.haddad@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hello, I still don't understand why the below ACL can't be grouped:interface Loopback0ip pim sparse-dense-mode!ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 16 group-list 50!access-list 50 permit 226.0.0.0 1.255.255.255access-list 50 permit 228.0.0.0 3.255.255.255access-list 50 permit 232.0.0.0 3.255.255.255access-list 50 permit 236.0.0.0 1.255.255.255access-list 50 permit 238.0.0.0 0.255.255.255Why can't we group them as:access-list 50 permit 226.0.0.0 12.255.255.255Thanks for the clarification,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART