From: theKonqueror (thekonqueror@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2008 - 04:01:48 ART
Grouping the access lists as 226.0.0.0 12.255.255.255 will also allow
following groups:
227.0.0.1
229.0.0.1
231.0.0.1
233.0.0.1
234.0.0.1
235.0.0.1
237.0.0.1
If the task says, configure rp for ONLY given groups, then the 1 line acl
cannot be used. I'd ask proctor for clarification on this.
Thanks,
Rahul
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Mike Haddad <mike.haddad@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I still don't understand why the below ACL can't be grouped:
> interface Loopback0
> ip pim sparse-dense-mode
> !
> ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 16 group-list 50
> !
> access-list 50 permit 226.0.0.0 1.255.255.255
> access-list 50 permit 228.0.0.0 3.255.255.255
> access-list 50 permit 232.0.0.0 3.255.255.255
> access-list 50 permit 236.0.0.0 1.255.255.255
> access-list 50 permit 238.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
>
>
> Why can't we group them as:
> access-list 50 permit 226.0.0.0 12.255.255.255
>
> Thanks for the clarification,
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Enter the Hunt & you could win a 2008 Eclipse Spyder! Click here to enter!
> http://g.msn.ca/ca55/213
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Bugs can neither be created nor be removed from software by a developer. They can only be converted from one form to another. The total number of bugs in the software always remain constant..}l}..}l}.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:54 ART