From: abdul muhammed (abdulmuri@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 17 2008 - 04:45:13 ART
thank u all,
just curious about the two options that if I can use the loopback 0 address
as my router-id why should I bother myself with another router-id
On 3/17/08, srinivas pv <vsrinivas.paturi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If the router-id is distinguishable from the router-ids of other routers
> in your topology, it should be fine. To avoid these type of conflicts, it is
> better to use loopback as router id.
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:22 PM, abdul muhammed <abdulmuri@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi GS,
> >
> > what is the implication of using a different router-id from Loopback 0
> > address.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Abdul Muhammed Murtala
> > AMerican University of Nigeria
> > Lamido Zubairu way, Yola
> > Adamawa
> > +2348052001153, +2348056201237
> >
> > Network Manager
> > MCSE,MCDBA,MCSA,OCPDBA,CCNA,CCIE Written.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
-- Abdul Muhammed Murtala AMerican University of Nigeria Lamido Zubairu way, Yola Adamawa +2348052001153, +2348056201237Network Manager MCSE,MCDBA,MCSA,OCPDBA,CCNA,CCIE Written.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:53 ART