RE: HSRP tracking of Frame Relay physical interface

From: Shine Joseph (shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au)
Date: Thu Mar 13 2008 - 10:10:24 ARST


Akhil,

Yes, you can use EEK to track the pvc status. But, how will you apply this
to track HSRP/VRRP?

Any comments welcome.

Regards,
Shine

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
AKHILESH THAKUR
Sent: Thursday, 13 March 2008 10:38 PM
To: Adel Karim; YourPal
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: RE: HSRP tracking of Frame Relay physical interface

Dear Emil,
I think you can use End to End keepalive option to track the pvc status.

Regards
Akhi> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:00:20 +0200> From: adelkarim@gmail.com> To:
dearprudence28@gmail.com> Subject: Re: HSRP tracking of Frame Relay physical
interface> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com> > Hi Emil,> > Yes, in this case you
should create a GRE tunnel with keepalives to be able> to track the PVC
state.> > Of course there are other means of tracking that you can use like
route> reachability or SLA.> > I don't think the proctor will be helping you
here since he/she will be> telling you how to answer the question.> > HTH>
Adel Karim Mansour> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:50 PM, YourPal
<dearprudence28@gmail.com> wrote:> > > Hi Group,> >> > I have a HSRP and
frame
relay setup as follows:> >> > R5 (fa0/0)--------(fa0/0) R1
(s0/0/0)------FrameRelay------(s0/0/0.125 mp)> > R2> >> > R1:> > int s0/0/0>
>
ip add 10.10.125.1 255.255.255.0> > enca fram> > no frame inver> > fram map
ip
10.10.125.2 102 br> > !> > int f0/0> > ip add 10.10.15.1 255.255.255.0> >
stand 1 ip 10.10.15.254> > stand 1 prio 110> > stand 1 preempt> > stand 1
track Serial0/0/0 20> > !> >> > R5:> > int fa0/0> > ip add 10.10.15.5
255.255.255.0> > stand 1 ip 10.10.15.254> > stand 1 preempt> > !> >> > Say,
R5
need to take over the HSRP active role if R1's frame relay> > connection is
down. I understand that if we have a frame relay connection> > using
physical
interface, the interface will never go down as long as LMI> > is> > working
fine.> >> > In this case, the HSRP tracking is effective if int s0/0/0
itself
is down> > but not when int s0/0/0 on R2 is down. Correct me if I'm wrong.
To
work> > around, are you bothered to configure a GRE tunnel (with keepalive)>
>
between> > R1 and R2 and track this tunnel interface in HSRP on R1?> >> > I
may be overthinking. I'd like to hear your opinion. It's best to clarify> >
with the proctor in the real lab to clear any ambiguity.> >> >> > Thank
you.>
>> > BR,> > Emil> >> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:53 ART