Re: Lab exam SUCCEED or FAILED

From: Ed Lui (edwlui@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2008 - 03:19:16 ARST

Next message: Roger: "RE: Proccessor requirement for dynamibs"
Previous message: Scott Vermillion: "RE: Legacy QoS tool"
Maybe in reply to: Ed Lui: "Lab exam SUCCEED or FAILED"
Next in thread: Rich Collins: "Re: Lab exam SUCCEED or FAILED"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

FOR CLARIFICATION

This topic is regarding my experience with a VENDOR'S MOCK LAB and NOT the
real lab. I have never taken the real lab and I will NOT talk about the real
lab now and in the future, I obey the NDA from Cisco.

Thanks for your feedback in any form..... :-)

Next message: Roger: "RE: Proccessor requirement for dynamibs"
Previous message: Scott Vermillion: "RE: Legacy QoS tool"
Maybe in reply to: Ed Lui: "Lab exam SUCCEED or FAILED"
Next in thread: Rich Collins: "Re: Lab exam SUCCEED or FAILED"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:52 ART