From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Sat Mar 01 2008 - 11:46:40 ARST
What happened to that fella Ron Paul over there? I kept an eye out on the
campaigning and such across the pond but after lots of interesting stuff
coming from him his coverage just seemed to fizzle out or basically
disappear from the media except youtube.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Hosford" <rhosford@certifiednets.com>
To: "Rich Collins" <nilsi2002@gmail.com>; "Gary Duncanson"
<gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
Cc: "Ronnie Angello" <ronnie.angello@gmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: Unassigned CCIE query.
When you see a job posting that wants a CCNA or CCIE it is someone that is
only interested in paying a CCNA rate. Then we don't accept that rate the
company can hire an H1B.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Rich
Collins
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 10:08 AM
To: Gary Duncanson
Cc: Ronnie Angello; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Unassigned CCIE query.
I'd like to just comment on the recruiters mixing CCNA and CCIE
requirements.
A few years back I got passed up by a recruiter who took a candidate with
the CCIE Written but no other Cisco certifications. The recruiter said that
she "was told" to rate that higher than my certifications CCNP/CCDP.
On another job I did get selected although they really wanted a CCIE.
Looking back I think that would have been really overkill. The applicable
network part had no active routing or particular security requirements. The
trickiest part was some more advanced HSRP.
But then I have met other recruiters who really knew what the experience and
certification match works out to be.
-Rich
On 2/27/08, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Fair comment Ronnie.
>
> Rgds
> Gary
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ronnie Angello" <ronnie.angello@gmail.com>
> To: "Scott Vermillion" <scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com>
> Cc: "Joseph Brunner" <joe@affirmedsystems.com>; "Darren Johnson"
> <dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk>; "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Unassigned CCIE query.
>
>
> > It's all about the direction that you want your career to go in. For
> me,
> > I'm currently in the Operations/Support business. I feel like the CCIE
> > is the top of the food chain. Granted, having CCIE
> > R&S/Sec/SP/Voice/Storage
> > would make you the ultimate support god. The CCIE doesn't really focus
> on
> > design concepts, but more on configuration and troubleshooting as we all
> > know.
> >
> > The CCDE however, focuses on design best practices and not so much
> > configuration commands and troubleshooting. In fact, there will be no
> > gear
> > involved in the CCDE practical exam. It's also doesn't focus on Cisco
> > solutions alone but is supposed to be a vendor neutral cert.
> >
> > So in my opinion, it all depends on what your career path is. Do you
> like
> > to live in the routers, switches, firewalls, CNRs, Call Manager, etc. or
> > would you rather just design solutions and pass them down for
> > implementation? I think both certs are (or will be) of equal value...
> but
> > I
> > sure wouldn't mind being one of the first with both!
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Scott Vermillion
> > <scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> LOL Joe, I did see that "strong CCNA" post. And, in that same vein, I
> >> recently posted my resume to Monster but clearly indicated in my
> profile
> >> that I am a contract worker who will travel but not relocate. I have
> >> been
> >> inundated with queries as to my willingness to move to (fill in the
> >> blank)
> >> and work shifts in some NOC. Often, the requirement for the position,
> >> certification-wise, is "CCNA/CCNP/CCIE." As if they were all pretty
> much
> >> the same damned thing!??
> >>
> >> I have never worked with recruiters in my life (and that was not the
> >> intent
> >> I had when posting my resume up - rather, I'm trying to get some hits
> >> from
> >> organizations searching for CCIEs in my area or who are willing to
> >> travel).
> >> I had no idea what pond scum these losers turn out to be. Talk about
> >> LAZY.
> >> If the top-paid recruiter (at least out of those who have been in touch
> >> with
> >> me) were to earn $20k/year, it'd be about $15k too much!
> >>
> >> But I digress...
> >>
> >> Back to the value of the CCIE (which I guess isn't strictly speaking on
> >> topic either, but close enough):
> >>
> >> It's clear that Cisco views the new CCDE as top dog. It has been taken
> >> down
> >> from every site that I have been able to locate (at either Cisco's
> >> request
> >> or insistence, I'm not sure which), but there was recently an interview
> >> with
> >> some female Cisco employee who worked inside of the certification
> >> program.
> >> She made clear that, although the CCIE and CCDE were both expert-level
> >> certifications, the CCDE was going to be an order of magnitude more
> >> difficult to obtain and would in practice be a level up in the
> hierarchy.
> >> She spoke of the CCIE almost disparagingly. No wonder that interview
> was
> >> made to disappear so quickly!
> >>
> >> My limited personal experience thus far has been that the CCIE is
> >> valuable
> >> and adds to your luster. I have been contacted regarding opportunities
> >> that
> >> were not being made available to me prior to certification. However,
> >> it's
> >> thus far really done nothing for my consulting business, as
> organizations
> >> generally want to gobble up CCIEs all to themselves as W2 wage earners
> >> (often to meet these channel requirements or just to add to their own
> >> luster
> >> in the eyes of their own clients). I suppose time will tell as to the
> >> longer-term impact of both the CCDE and the growth of the CCIE program
> >> itself. In the mean time, I do personally perceive that the channel
> >> requirements are our friends in terms of sustaining our value in the
> >> overall
> >> marketplace.
> >>
> >> And I continue to work on my rather rusty IS-IS skills as part of my
> new
> >> SP
> >> endeavors. LOL...
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Joseph Brunner
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:32 AM
> >> To: 'Scott Vermillion'; 'Darren Johnson'; 'Cisco certification'
> >> Subject: RE: Unassigned CCIE query.
> >>
> >> That's fair, I agree.
> >>
> >> But what I'm saying is the $100k offered to CCIE's is often inadequate
> (I
> >> mean come on, its nearly impossible to support a family on that income
> >> nowadays almost anywhere without being in debt)
> >>
> >> So what the guy needs is an extra $50k a year. What we should be
> talking
> >> about is what the hell happened that he can't just get $170k a year or
> >> more
> >> and just relax.
> >>
> >> I'll tell you...
> >>
> >> The value of someone who knows what they are doing just isn't there
> >> anymore... Did you see my post a couple of weeks back "CCIE required or
> >> will
> >> consider a STRONG CCNA" from a dice post.
> >>
> >> The value of the CCIE has decreased because IT is quickly losing its
> >> value
> >> to businesses (even though they need it).
> >>
> >> If you are out there, please, NRF, tell us again why IT will all be
> >> outshored to India very soon and that companies no longer have "in
> house
> >> electricians"...
> >>
> >> -Joe
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Scott Vermillion
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 1:22 PM
> >> To: 'Joseph Brunner'; 'Darren Johnson'; 'Cisco certification'
> >> Subject: RE: Unassigned CCIE query.
> >>
> >> Of course there always exists a way to cheat the system (just like the
> >> lab
> >> or the written) if someone is truly determined Joe. But the CCIE
> >> requirement for partners is meant to ensure high standards in the
> channel
> >> program. I believe that it's one of the few things still keeping CCIE
> >> salaries high, as there are hiring organizations out there that
> >> absolutely
> >> *must* retain CCIEs to keep their businesses viable. If what you
> propose
> >> were to become common, then CCIE salaries likely _would_ drop to the
> $50k
> >> mark, as rather than actually needing to hire them at $100k+, they
> could
> >> just go out and do this end-around on the program requirements and
> never
> >> actually hire any CCIEs with the intent that they act in a senior
> network
> >> engineering role. I think the symbiosis here between CCIEs and channel
> >> partners has to be respected or we all suffer (whether or not we
> >> personally
> >> chose to work for one)...
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Joseph Brunner
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:08 AM
> >> To: 'Scott Vermillion'; 'Darren Johnson'; 'Cisco certification'
> >> Subject: RE: Unassigned CCIE query.
> >>
> >> This doesn't really matter, and does not prove anything.
> >>
> >> The GOLD PARNTER can just pay someone say $50,000 on a W2 as a CCIE and
> >> for
> >> that I agree to let them USE my number, and do at least 1 conference
> call
> >> with their clients each month. There would be no way to tell how many
> >> hours
> >> the guy was there...
> >>
> >> That seems like fair use to me... How about you guys?
> >>
> >> Therefore, I am an employee. The deal is I'm never there, yet I still
> get
> >> paid. They get a CCIE's number for their roster and a low salary no
> sane
> >> CCIE would work for...
> >>
> >> ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Scott Vermillion
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 12:51 PM
> >> To: 'Darren Johnson'; 'Cisco certification'
> >> Subject: RE: Unassigned CCIE query.
> >>
> >> Hey Darren,
> >>
> >> The bottom line is that you cannot do what you're proposing. Last time
> >> this
> >> came up, I (or somebody - maybe it wasn't be after all) went and found
> >> the
> >> audit rules for partner status. Those made very, very clear that any
> >> CCIE
> >> numbers being used for partner status had to be *full-time* regular
> >> employees and that (IIRC), the auditor could review payroll records,
> etc,
> >> to
> >> validate that the CCIE was an active, daily participant in the
> business.
> >>
> >> I'm in the same situation. I work independently and thus my number
> >> floats.
> >> I don't really want to work in a partner/reseller environment, though,
> so
> >> that aspect of my number holds no value. Oh well...
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Darren Johnson
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:41 AM
> >> To: 'Cisco certification'
> >> Subject: Unassigned CCIE query.
> >>
> >> Hey all. As per my post last week, I passed the lab and now have an
> >> unassigned CCIE number (I paid for study and lab myself). I'm now in a
> >> position where I'm weighing up my options. Is it possible to 'rent' out
> >> my
> >> CCIE number to a company, whilst still remaining employed by my present
> >> employer? I have heard of rentacert.com but people seemed skeptical of
> >> it.
> >>
> >> Let me stress, I DO NOT WANT TO VIOLATE ANY CISCO POLICIES and if
> renting
> >> out a cert is doing so, I WILL NOT DO IT. However, if it is
> >> possible/legal
> >> and people out there do it, can they kindly explain how it works. I
> want
> >> to
> >> get as much value out of my cert as possible.
> >>
> >> Thanks for ANY advice
> >>
> >> Darren
> >> #20078
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___________________________________________________________
> >> Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to
> use"
> >> The Wall Street Journal
> >> http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ronald Angello
> > CCIE #17846
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:51 ART