From: rodrigo.gutierrez@nsn.com
Date: Mon Feb 25 2008 - 18:19:30 ARST
Thanks to all who answered my question, quite clear now,
regards
Rodrigo Gutiirrez
IP/Engineer.
Cisco Certified Network Professional, CCNP
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
>Behalf Of ext dara tomar
>Sent: Sabado, 23 de Febrero de 2008 01:48 a.m.
>To: Gutierrez Rodrigo (NSN - CO/Santa Fe de Bogota)
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: BGP-WEIGHT
>
>*Hi Rodrigo,
>
>
>Specific weight per neighbor ==> Setting weights to all the
>prefixes received from a neighbor.
>
>Rote-map used to apply weight ==> setting the weight only on
>specific prefixes.
>
>Regards,
>Dara*
>
>On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:15 AM, <rodrigo.gutierrez@nsn.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When using the attribute weight on BGP, what is the difference and
>> when it should be used either on a route-map or directly
>with the neighbor, example:
>>
>> router bgp 100
>> no synchronization
>> bgp router-id 150.6.6.6
>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>> neighbor 54.6.3.254 remote-as 54
>> neighbor 54.6.3.254 weight 100
>>
>> Versus
>>
>> router bgp 100
>> no synchronization
>> bgp router-id 150.6.6.6
>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>> neighbor 54.6.3.254 remote-as 54
>> neighbor 54.6.3.254 route-map SET-WEIGHT in
>>
>> Route-map SET-WEIGHT permit 10
>> - set weight 100
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Rodrigo Gutiirrez
>> IP/Engineer.
>>
>> Rodrigo Gutiirrez
>> IP/Engineer.
>> Cisco Certified Network Professional, CCNP Mobile Phone #
>> :57-310-580-0973 Monday - Friday : 8:00-16:00 EST
>> rodrigo.gutierrez@nsn.com Nokia Siemens Networks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST