From: Paul Borghese (pborghese@groupstudy.com)
Date: Mon Feb 25 2008 - 18:31:43 ARST
Hi Marc,
According to Cisco, RIP v1 has been removed from the lab.
You should almost always use "no auto-summary" under RIP, EIGRP, and BGP
unless the lab forbids it or has a requirement that would prevent it's use.
Paul Borghese
Certification Science
http://www.certscience.com
Give us six weeks, and we guarantee you will pass the CCIE
Yes we accept Cisco Learning Credits
1-800-754-0349 x101
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Marc
La Porte
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:58 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RIP
Hi experts!
A couple questions about RIP:
1. Is there still RIPv1 on the lab?
2. If it says to configure RIPv2 is it then implicit to configure "no
auto-summary"?
Scenario:
f0/0 (VLAN_C)
| fa0/0 (VLAN_A) --- R1
--- serial --- R3 --- serial --- R2 --- fa0/0 (VLAN_B)
VLAN_A: 1.0.0.0/8
VLAN_B: 2.0.0.0/8
VLAN_C: 3.0.0.0/8
Serial (R1-R3): 13.0.0.0/8
Serial (R2-R3): 23.0.0.0/8
R3 should not advertise the route for VLAN B to R1 nor should it advertise
the route for VLAN A to R2...
My solution on R3:
router rip
distribute-list 1 out serial 1/2 <--- direction of R2 distribute-list 2
out serial 1/1 <--- direction of R1 !
access-list 1 deny 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 1 permit any !
access-list 2 deny 2.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 2 permit any
IE Solution on R3:
router rip
distribute-list prefix ONLY_VLAN_C out
!
ip prefix-list ONLY_VLAN_C seq 5 permit 3.0.0.0/8
Conclusion: I think my solution is better as it stops the advertisement of
VLAN_A and VLAN_B, but still advertises the subnets of the serial links. The
IE solutions doesn't do that... so I feel they filter more than requested...
Appreciate your input on both the questions and the scenario...
Marc
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST